These agreements, specific to real estate transactions within the state, represent a unique financing mechanism. The arrangement allows a buyer to obtain equitable title to a property while the seller retains legal title as security for the purchase price. This differs from a traditional mortgage, where a third-party lender provides the financing. Instead, the seller directly finances the purchase for the buyer, essentially acting as the bank. An example would be a situation where an individual wishes to purchase a home but does not qualify for conventional financing due to credit issues. They might enter into this type of agreement with the property owner, making payments directly to the seller over a set period.
These agreements offer potential avenues for individuals who might otherwise face difficulties securing property ownership. Historically, they have provided opportunities in underserved communities and situations where traditional lending is scarce. The structure can allow for more flexible terms compared to standard mortgages, potentially benefiting both parties. Sellers might attract a wider pool of buyers, while buyers gain a pathway to ownership. However, due diligence is crucial due to the inherent risks involved, particularly regarding legal title and potential forfeiture.